« WashPost Creates Supreme Court Blog | Main | Guessing the Demographics of Bloggers »

Monday, July 25, 2005

Does Blocking Negative Domain Names Make Sense?

MediaPost observes a growing trend for campaigns on the web:

Democratic political consultant Michael Bassik adds that many political campaigns are purchasing variations of their candidates' names. "It's common for campaigns to not only purchase up every permutation of their own campaign's name, but also negative URLs as well," said Democratic political consultant Michael Bassik. "That's exactly what George Bush did in 2004. He not only purchased his own positive names, but names that could be used against him."

The problem with this strategy is that it is impossible to come up with every negative domain name an opponent could use.  Perhaps you can protect against lame ones like "BushSucks," but what about "ClintonLies" -- where does it end?  Despite Bush's efforts, for example, About.com has a whole section of Anti-Bush sites.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/320437/5554739

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Does Blocking Negative Domain Names Make Sense?:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Advertisements

What Is Pardon the Disruption?

  • As founder & CEO of CustomScoop, I have a special interest in the intersection of technology and PR/marketing. In addition, as a serial entrepreneur and angel investor, I cover those topics, as well as an occasional post on the gadgets I love.