« March 2007 | Main | May 2007 »

April 2007

Saturday, April 28, 2007

Doing Second Life Right

Mitch Joel offers up a post today on examples of some marketers he thinks are doing Second Life right.  He sees a shift from the "build it and they will come" philosophy to one in which companies seek to engage consumers in the Second Life experience through contests and other activities.

In the past couple of weeks it would seem like Marketers are starting to understand the power of marketing in Second Life and other virtual worlds. My main contention with previous Second Life marketing initiatives was that brands were entering the Metaverse, buying islands and were then “open for business.” It became apparent – quickly – that the Field Of Dreams model of, “build it and they will come” was not the ideal execution. We’ve seen countless islands that are now abandoned and seem more appropriate for a Discovery Channel documentary on lost civilizations then in the still-buzzing hype of Second Life.

Singled out for credit are Coke's Virtual Thirst campaign being run by crayon and an avatar creation contest by fashion company Lacoste.

Mitch concludes:

Both examples seem simple enough… and that’s the point. Second Life is complicated enough, so the big Marketing lesson is to leverage the Second Life community, make it easy to enter and fun to win. It also helps that both of these examples enable non-Second Life residents to take part and get interested. This has remarkable strategic by-products: it may well be that what Lacoste and Coke are doing in Second Life will stimulate people who never would have entered the Metaverse to take a look, and – hopefully – try out virtual worlds.

Second Life marketing is coming of age… and this is just the beginning.

I'm still not convinced about Second Life as a marketing vehicle.  I do participate in the weekly Coffee with Crayon event where about 30 online marketers get together inside Second Life to chat about issues of the day.  And I do feel like I get value out of it.  But it also feels a bit clunky to me and I can already sense the novelty of commenting on the style and appearance of others' avatars is wearing thin.  In many respects, I feel like I've turned the clock back 10 years to when I used to organize online chats. 

Perhaps what concerns me most is that there seems to be relatively little discussion of outcomes.  I believe that Shel Holtz and Neville Hobson did touch briefly on the ROI potential of Virtual Thirst on a recent episode of For Immediate Release, but in general I think companies need to do a better job of thinking through what they want to accomplish by participating in Second Life and then subsequently monitoring and measuring to see if those goals -- whatever they may be -- are being achieved.

Have We Reached the Peak of Mount Blog?

Great digging by Heather Green at BusinessWeek has uncovered the dirty little secret about the blogosphere that so many of us have surmised for some time.  It ain't nearly as big as the hype indicates, though it remains incredibly important for communicators.  Heather convinced David Sifry of Technorati to release more detailed data abbot his state of the blogosphere report.  Technorati claim to be tracking 70 million blogs.  That's not really accurate, however.  The truth is that the blog search engine has tracked 70 million different blogs at one time or another.  But just about 15 million of those have been updated in the past 90 days, suggesting that the vast majority of monitored blogs are dead.

When a blog loses its pulse, there's no need to include it in the population any longer.

Heather also writes: "The number of daily English language posts dropped to 495,000 in March from 507,000 in October."  The numbers she published also reveal that growth in active blogs over the same period of time was minimal: 15.3 million last fall and 15.5 million today.

Obviously, that's still a huge number of blogs and nothing that can be ignored.  But a good lesson for all here is that hyping numbers can end up making you look silly.  In this case, the reality of 15 million is still impressive; saying 71 million just doesn't hold up against the facts.

I would love to see even more detailed data that indicates of the 15 million active, how many update more than once a week?  Once a month?  With less than a half million English posts every day, the number that post regularly must be incredibly small.  Ultimately, those with a regular publishing schedule and audience will be the ones that are most likely to be influential.

One final note.  The number of English blog posts daily stands at about the same as (or perhaps even a little less than) what we see at CustomScoop as far as the number of online stories from traditional media outlets each day.  Put in that context, the blogosphere seems a lot less daunting to monitor.

Ownership of Ideas in the Age of Information Overload

Jeremiah Owyang today writes an open letter to a speaker who apparently cribbed from his blog in making a presentation -- without offering any credit:

It’s a professional courtesy to cite others, especially if they’ve worked hard to get the knowledge that they have. Also, it adds to your credibility, as third party sources can validate your point. Since we’re in a very open community, people talk, and people will find out anyways if you use someone’s work without their permission.

First, let me say that Jeremiah is absolutely correct that if you directly take someone's information or ideas and use them in a presentation/speech/article you should attribute them.

The simplest case is in citing concrete information or data. If you copy something, you need to credit it.  But what about ideas?  I read hundreds of blogs posts every day, and I know that my thinking is deeply impacted by what I read.  I often find myself saying things -- perhaps a factual tidbit or a concept -- that I think I may have read elsewhere.  But if I don't recall specially, how do I cite it?

A simple case in point occurred last weekend with me and Jeremiah, ironically.  I had remembered seeing a particular photograph but I couldn't remember where.  I described the photo on my blog and the fact that I didn't know its provenance.  Jeremiah helpfully commented that it was from his blog, so I linked over to it so my readers could see what I was talking about rather than being forced to visualize it.

Obviously, I have no idea the circumstances that motivated Jeremiah to write his post.  I imagine it was something clear-cut and egregious.  But in a world in which many of us are reading huge volumes of material every day, ownership and attribution of ideas becomes a much more difficult concept to wrap our arms around.  It doesn't mean we should ignore it, it just means we have to work that much harder to be aware of the challenge and find ways to address it as well as can be done.

Dell (In)Direct?

I found this story in today's New York Times to be fascinating.  In a world in which customization, direct service, and online shopping seem to be the order of the day, Dell seems poised to break from its past and consider selling through retail channels.  That's a dramatic departure and one seemingly at odds with current trends.

Or is it?  One of the things that the modern Internet teaches us it that people want immediate gratification more than ever.  People expect to be able to download software on demand and start using it immediately.  None of this ordering it and getting it shipped.  They want to be able to sign up for a web-based service and use it now, not later. 

Of course, it's harder to get immediate gratification with computer hardware without the retail experience.  Go ahead and try to download your next computer and see how far you get. 

The challenge for Dell is that unlike Apple or Lenovo (maker of Thinkpads), the Austin, TX company focused on delivering customized computers to consumers.  Others who sell through retail outlets offer a streamlined selection of cookie-cutter solutions.

So the question that must be answered is: can Dell balance the need for immediate gratification with customization?

A Flurry of Posts Are Coming. Here's Why.

This has been an especially hectic week for me as I have been on the road for business since Tuesday.  Now, that's not all that uncommon for me as regular readers will know.  I am on the road almost every week for 3 days or so.  But this week I had to combine my business activities in Washington, DC with my responsibilities as part of the American University School of Public Affairs Advisory Council.  I found myself shuttling between downtown DC and the AU campus on 3 consecutive days, which for those of you familiar with the city will understand is not a quick, easy trip.

The Council is a great group -- this was my first meeting -- with a lot of diversity in background, experience, and views.  I hope to be able to continue to contribute to the efforts that Dean Bill LeoGrande and his team at SPA are making and to work with the broader American University community in general. 

In any event, I have gotten caught up now on my reading, and I have a bunch of topics I want to address.  I'm going to try to hit on as many as I can before the Red Sox-Yankees game begins.

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

Come Learn About Social Media

On May 15, Doug Haslam of Topaz Partners and I will present a Social Media Skills Workshop for the PRSA Yankee Chapter.  The event will be held at Southern New Hampshire University in Manchester, NH from 1-5 PM.  Cost is $35 for PRSA Yankee Chapter members and $45 for non-members.

This will be an information packed afternoon with time for hands-on learning. Below is the official description, or you can download the event flyer with tentative agenda and registration form in PDF format.  If you're interested in learning more about blogs, podcasts, and other forms of social media, I encourage you to register now

SOCIAL MEDIA SKILLS WORKSHOP
presented by Yankee Chapter/PRSA and sponsored by Southern NH University

Spend a half-day (1-5pm) learning all about social media, including blogs and podcasts.  By the end of this seminar, you will have learned how to:

  • Pitch your company or client successfully!
  • Build relationships through commenting on blogs and podcasts!
  • Communicate your message unfiltered through your own blog or podcast!
  • Assess your social media coverage using free or paid services! 

In addition, part of the workshop will include hands-on training where you will actually help create a simple blog and podcast.

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Disruptive Dialogue #7 - 04/24/2007

download Disruptive Dialogue podcastThe seventh episode of the Disruptive Dialogue podcast is now available.  This one was recorded in Bow, NH and is 22:52.  You can download this podcast as an MP3 or subscribe to the RSS feed to make sure you never miss an episode.

Topics:

  • 00:34 - Opening & Introduction
  • 02:07 - Future of Media (TV news, radio listenership, online ad revenue for newspapers)
  • 11:43 - Is it OK to pitch bloggers you don't know?
  • 17:07 - Podcasting sponsorship
  • 21:25 - Wrap-up

Show Notes:

To Comment:

  • Leave your comments here
  • Call the Disruptive Dialogue comment line: (206) 424-4733
  • Email me your comments in MP3 format (no more than 2 minutes and 5 MB, please)

What Kenny Rogers Teaches Entrepreneurs

This past weekend I heard Kenny Rogers' "The Gambler" and realized this song teaches us a lot about how to run an effective Internet startup.  So I dug up the full lyrics for the song and will share what I think it means for entrepreneurs.

On a warm summer's evenin' on a train bound for nowhere,
I met up with the gambler; we were both too tired to sleep.
So we took turns a starin' out the window at the darkness
'Til boredom overtook us, and he began to speak.

When you start your company, you can look forward to many sleepless nights, wondering what to do.  Wherever you think you're headed with your company in those early days, I can almost certainly assure you will not be where you end up.  Companies evolve just like people do.  Ten years ago I couldn't have predicted to you that I'd be living in New Hampshire running a successful media intelligence company, but that's exactly what happened.  Your startup will follow a similarly unpredictable trajectory, correcting its course over time if it is to be successful.

He said, "Son, I've made my life out of readin' people's faces,
And knowin' what their cards were by the way they held their eyes.
so if you don't mind my sayin', I can see you're out of aces.
For a taste of your whiskey I'll give you some advice."

Lots of people -- including me in this post -- will offer you advice for your business.  Finding your own version of The Gambler who will help you out when you're least optimistic about the future of your endeavor will be important.  Frankly, you also want that voice when you get too high on your prospects, too, as it is important to take a balanced perspective to make good decisions.  Most businesses benefit from a business partner who complements your skills and outlook.  You can go it alone, but the businesses that tend to excel usually have at least two partners to keep each other on an even keel.

So I handed him my bottle and he drank down my last swallow.
Then he bummed a cigarette and asked me for a light.
And the night got deathly quiet, and his face lost all expression.
Said, "If you're gonna play the game, boy, ya gotta learn to play it right.

Remember that you won't get this advice or partnership for free.  Even advisors who don't want cash will want to get some value out of their relationship with you.  Maybe it is relationships and networking, or perhaps it is entirely the psychic reward of helping an entrepreneur, but whatever it is you want to make sure you go into the relationship with your eyes open. 

You also need to be prepared to give in order to get.  Don't be greedy about equity.  Be willing to share it generously with partners and key employees to promote the success of the business.  It may feel at first like you're simply out of whisky, but what you receive in return may just be worth it.

You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em,
Know when to walk away and know when to run.
You never count your money when you're sittin' at the table.
There'll be time enough for countin' when the dealin's done.

These are, of course, the signature lines of the song.  When I mentioned the song at the top of this posts, no doubt your mind went right to them.  Not surprisingly, they provide a tremendous amount of powerful advice for the startup entrepreneur.

Over the course of the life of your startup, you'll be looking at tons of deals and negotiations.  Whether it is adding a partner, hiring an employee, doing a business development deal, signing a customer, working with a vendor, lining up an investor, or ultimately selling the company, you will need to decide what a good deal is.  Some deals simply aren't worth doing, and you need to avoid the urge to do a deal at any cost.  Especially in the early days of a company or when things are going tough, you'll be tempted to say I need this customer or investor to survive, or if I don't do some deal, I will lose momentum.  Hogwash.  If you're building something successful, there is no such thing as only one way to go.  That type of thinking gets entrepreneurs -- and even established businesses -- in trouble.

now Ev'ry gambler knows that the secret to survivin'
Is knowin' what to throw away and knowing what to keep.
'Cause ev'ry hand's a winner and ev'ry hand's a loser,
And the best that you can hope for is to die in your sleep."

Just as important, you need to understand not just what deals to walk or run away from, but which projects and products to do the same with -- some will be winners and others losers.  Picking those will be a key to success.  Over the course of the nearly 10 years that I have been starting and running businesses, I have had numerous occasions where I have had a product or project nearly at completion -- or even completed -- that I have walked away from.  You need to trust information and instinct to make these decisions.  Just because you have invested heavily in creating something doesn't mean that you necessarily need to keep going forward with it. 

If you watch poker on TV, the commentators will often say that a player is "pot-committed" and therefore must continue to play the hand even if commonsense tells them to walk away.  While there may be something to this in tournament poker where it is a zero sum game, that's not how business is.  Conditions change and as you learn more over the course of creating something, you need to be prepared to shift directions, just as Topix did recently when it completely revamped its business.

so when he'd finished speakin', he turned back towards the window,
Crushed out his cigarette and faded off to sleep.
And somewhere in the darkness the gambler, he broke even.
But in his final words I found an ace that I could keep.

People with advice will come and go, but you're still on that train to somewhere with your business.  Do your best to pick out the valuable nuggets even when that person -- or blog post -- is long forgotten.

You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em,
Know when to walk away and know when to run.
You never count your money when you're sittin' at the table.
There'll be time enough for countin' when the dealin's done.

When the time comes that you are contemplating selling your business, wait until the deal is done before you start picking out cars, boats, and houses.  As our company attorney once said to me, when you start spending the deal money before you have the check in hand, you make bad decisions on the deal documents.  He shared one case in particular where an entrepreneur already had picked out an expensive sports car, and therefore caved in on all the key deal terms simply to get the check.

Similarly, be careful that you don't begin to believe your own hype.  There are plenty of entrepreneurs who ended up broke because they saw dollar signs and stuck around too long.  Unfortunately, there are probably just as many who exited too soon and didn't get the big payday they might have.  Figuring out when to exit will be one of the toughest things you ever have to do.

Hopefully, in the end, the company won't die in its sleep but will instead give you a nice, satisfying exit.

Pushing the Envelope: A Vision of the Future of TV News

Dave Winer offers an interesting post on his vision of the future of news on television.  He sees a time when viewers get to control their personal view of the news.  By providing preference information, they would see the kinds of stories they're most interested in. 

He suggests it would become a "river of news," much like some RSS readers offer currently for text-based information:

I could see MSNBC including stories produced by CNN, and sharing revenue with them. The goal is to get the best news experience tailored to the interests of specific users.

Certainly thought-provoking, but I have a hard time seeing competing networks offering each others' video on a regular basis.  Nevertheless, the whole post is worth a read because it will make you think.

If You Own an iPod, You Probably Listen to Less Radio

Podcasting News points to a new Abritron report that covers the portable media space:

While Arbitron’s analysis paints a fairly rosy picture of the state of radio, their stats confirm several industry trends that may cause concern for traditional radio broadcasters:

  • More and more people are getting portable media players. The percent of Americans that have portable media players grew from 22% to 30% in the last year.
  • Many portable media player owners listen to less radio. Arbitron reports that about a third of those that own iPods or other portable media players listen to less radio as a result.
  • Podcasting is one of the few audio platforms seeing significant growth. Awareness of podcasting has lept ahead of HD radio, and its audience is catching up with Internet radio’s audience.
  • The audience that traditional media is losing to Internet media tends to be young and affluent.

Online Ad Revenue for Newspapers Slipping

From PaidContent:

as the earnings for the NYTCO, Gannett and Tribune have shown, interactive ad dollars are not growing as expected (Dow Jones and the smaller Journal Register Company represent the exceptions). And as WaPO prepares to release its Q1 earnings, the CEO of its online division tells the WSJ that online ad growth is slowing across the board.

David Halberstam, 1934-2007

It was with sadness that I saw last night a bulletin that one of my favorite authors had died in a car accidentDavid Halberstam, writer of American history and sports, was the passenger in a car in Menlo Park, CA the was broad-sided by another. 

Halberstam was a master story-teller who wrote "popular history" better than most.  For me, he joins the likes of Stephen Ambrose, David McCullough, and Doris Kearns Goodwin, as writers of our day who could write history in an engaging and accessible fashion, rather than the dry, academic style that so many of us were used to in our school days.

I understand that he had one book already in the pipeline for this fall on the Korean War.  It sounds as if it may already be complete, so we may yet get to enjoy one more good Halberstam.

He will be missed.

Sunday, April 22, 2007

Constantly Retest Assumptions

Just because you knew something 6 months ago, doesn't mean you know it today.  What do I mean?  I'm not talking about historical knowledge -- that doesn't change.  But let's say direct mail or online advertising was working really well for you or your web site achieved certain performance benchmarks consistently.  But is it the same today?  And I encourage you not to rely purely on topline numbers or facts, periodically dig a little deeper to make sure the data means what you think it does.

I had a situation just this past week where I sat down with my team and looked at some numbers that we believed still meant the same that it did a while back.  But when we dug through the details, we realized that the picture was significantly different than what we were perceiving and what the broad brushstroke numbers were implying.  When we finally had the true picture, we were able to make some important decisions that I think will prove to be profitable.

So don't spend all your time second guessing yourself, but on some sort of regular basis you should retest your basic assumptions and make sure that reality hasn't changed.

Technorati tags: , ,

Saturday, April 21, 2007

Dumb Data = Dumb Decisions

I'm a numbers junkie.  Heck, if I actually liked complex math, I'd probably have wound up as a quant jock for a hedge fund.  So when I'm managing a company or project, I like to rely on real numbers -- solid facts -- to make decisions.  I don't ignore my gut feel, but I've learned that numbers lie less often than my gut.

That said, it's vital to be looking at accurate data and comparing apples to oranges.  Working on solving a problem this week, my team and I looked at a flood of data.  Stream of numbers were laid out in front of us.  We organized them into different formats -- tables, line charts, bar charts, and more.  We adjusted numbers to control for different factors.  One guy was hard at work discarding "outliers" and calculating standard deviations.

At the end of the day, though, I realized that it all comes down to having good data.  You have to collect the right data points and then analyze them correctly.  The right data will help you make the right decisions.  Otherwise, you'll find yourself making dumb decisions based on dumb data.

Live Blogging Kicked Up a Notch with Video

Speaking of Shel Holtz, he has a great post about the next step in the live blogging revolution: live video.  This has been a topic of conversation in tech blogs this week because of the Web 2.0 expo.  I'll let Shel explain:

Over at PodTech Robert Scoble and Jeremiah Owyang took UStream for a spin at the recent Web 2.0 conference, using the live streaming capability to broadcast panel discussions and other activities. (Jeremiah wrote about it here.)

I can't recall where I saw it but there's a great if ridiculous photo of Scoble sitting next to Chris Pirillo while Chris is typing and Scoble is wearing a head-cam.  And did I mention they were on a panel at that time?  Only at a tech conference...

Though I managed to be enmeshed in the recent live blogging controversy, I suspect that I'll be able to remain on the sidelines of this discussion as I'm not sure I'm likely to become a videographer.  (Shel #1, Shel Israel, has an interesting post on the subject, especially since he was at ground zero of the debate.) 

I guess I'll just have to stick to annoying panelists and fellow attendees with keyboard clatter.

UPDATE: Jeremiah reminds me in the comments that I saw the photo on his blog.  It was from David Parmet.

Church of the Absurd

I was stunned this morning when I read Shel Holtz's post about Ben McConnell of the Church of the Customer blog arguing that PR pros should "stop pitching bloggers you don't know." 

Ben and sidekick Jackie Huba are smart people.  They're also very influential in the online marketing realm and have an increased profile of late as they tour to promote their Citizen Marketers book (which they've managed to get me to cite in two posts already today!).  To see one of them make such an absurd argument is startling to say the least.

Not all of what Ben says is bad advice.  He does argue that you shouldn't add bloggers to your latest blast email touting your announcement.  That's absolutely correct.  But as Shel points out in his post and as I do in my 7 Deadly Sins of Pitching Bloggers white paper, there are good ways to reach out to bloggers you don't already know.

Sticking your head in the sand and dealing only with friends in the blogosphere makes no sense. In this case, the Church of the Customer seems to be worshiping a false prophet.

Online Engagement

Jim Horton has written a thoughtful paper on "engagement" in the blogosphere.  No, not the precursor to marital bliss, this is an analysis of what the term means for blogosphere bliss for PR practitioners and marketers.  He includes descriptions of the ranges of people involved in writing and reading blogs (Engaged, Information Seekers, Aware, and Uninvolved).  In some respects, his descriptions are similar to what Jackie Huba and Ben McConnell discuss in Citizen Marketers.

He includes tips on how companies should get involved in the blogosphere along with suggestions for specific techniques to join the conversation.  Worth a read for anyone interested in thinking about this issue.

Friday, April 20, 2007

Humor is Important

Every other Friday, we do what we call a "Payday Pizza Presentation" where one of our team members makes a presentation on a topic we think would be of interest to everyone while we all eat free food.  Sometimes its about internal processes, at other times it may be about industry dynamics, technology trends, social media ideas, etc.

Today, we had a discussion about a project we're working on that is close to launching.  As part of it, the individual making the presentation discussed the goals of the project and introduced it with a parody he created of a Despair.com poster.  (BTW, those guys produce some very funny stuff and I encourage you to check out their offerings.) 

That slide in the presentation -- reproduced above -- had the whole team in stitches.  Just a little reminder that humor plays an important role in the workplace.

Technorati tags: , ,

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

Disruptive Dialogue #6 - 04/17/2007

download Disruptive Dialogue podcastThe sixth episode of the Disruptive Dialogue podcast is now available.  This one was recorded in Bow, NH and is 28:51.  You can download this podcast as an MP3 or subscribe to the RSS feed to make sure you never miss an episode.

Topics:

  • 00:34 - Opening & Introduction
  • 02:47 - wealthy people read blogs
  • 04:37 - an example of paying users in equity for creating content
  • 06:33 - comScore study on cookies and unique visitors
  • 08:30 - podcasting gear discussion
  • 11:01 - Kami Huyse on measuring social media
  • 13:55 - Ian Muir of CustomScoop wins REMIX contest
  • 14:31 - softening on Twitter
  • 15:56 - Marketing Over Coffee podcast
  • 17:37 - Blogger & Podcaster magazine launches
  • 19:14 - Paul Kedrosky on information statistics
  • 22:25 - Nikon D80 blogger giveaway
  • 25:51 - TechCrunch 20 conference
  • 27:48 - wrap-up

Show Notes:

To Comment:

  • Leave your comments here
  • Call the Disruptive Dialogue comment line: (206) 424-4733
  • Email me your comments in MP3 format (no more than 2 minutes and 5 MB, please)

Virginia Tech Tragedy, Connectedness, and the Blame Game

What happened yesterday at Virginia Tech surely represents one of the most brutal, cruel, and tragic events ever to occur on a college campus.  There are no words that can comfort the victims' families.  There are no actions that can make this situation right.

There are, however, some observations that come out of it, especially for those of us interested in the world of online communications and what it means for the state of connectedness in our society.

Electronic Communications Step Up in a Crisis

CNN repeatedly rolled cell phone video footage of part of the attack.  Citizen "journalists" shared still photos of the scene online and with media outlets.  Students commiserated and communicated via existing social networks like Facebook and MySpace.  Parents got information by SMS, email, and IM from their children.

Clearly, electronic communications among the students and with the outside world changed how this tragedy was covered and will be perceived.  But more important, it made it easier for students to communicate their status to their loved ones, and it provided additional outlets for students to communicate with each other.

The Blame Game

Some allege that Virginia Tech administrators failed to deploy electronic communications fast enough.  Apparently the first email to students went out 90 to 120 minutes after the first shooting.  The fog of crisis won't likely lift for several days so facts remain sketchy.

What troubles me, however, is the constant need to affix blame after a tragedy like this.  I see great value in taking lessons from these events and trying to apply them.  But it seems that there are always those who believe that every tragedy can be avoided.  That's simply not the case.

One talking head on TV yesterday claimed that with instant cell phone notifications the tragedy would have been largely averted.  She went so far as to suggest that Virginia Tech was irresponsible for not having such technology in place. 

Regrettably, tragedies happen.  It is impossible for any institution -- public or private, large or small -- to plan for every contingency.  Clearly, emergency plans should be considered.  Crisis communications plans must be prepared.  But we must all accept that there will be events beyond our comprehension that will occur. 

To blame the Virginia Tech administrators -- at least based on the information available at this moment -- is itself irresponsible and certainly unfair.   This tragedy dwarfs any other similar event in our nation's history.  To say that that university should have been prepared for a shooting of that magnitude strains credulity; in the past 40 years, there have been less than a handful of similar outbreaks on college campuses.

Moreover, to argue that any campus shooting demands a complete university lockdown makes no sense.  Media reports suggest nearly 30,000 students, faculty, and other employees live and work on campus.  A "lockdown" of such magnitude would be exceedingly difficult to execute -- at 30,000 people that's larger than most towns in New Hampshire.  Technology makes such communication easier, but executing on the details is much harder.

Inevitably, colleges and universities will be pressured to implement all sorts of new plans and security measures in the wake of this tragedy.  We would all be wise to remember that we cannot plan for or prevent every possible crisis.  Those that are clearly foreseeable -- a plane crash for an airline, an oil spill for an energy company, a power outage for a utility, a food poisoning outbreak for a restaurant -- should be actively planned for. 

But we must all accept that sometimes the blame relies strictly with the perpetrator.

Monday, April 16, 2007

Live Blogging My Blog Reading Catch-up

Having just returned from 10 days away from the office on business and vacation, I'm left to catch up on several thousand blog posts.  So here are my notes as I blaze through them at a blistering pace, no doubt missing some good stuff, but hopefully enjoying the foam on the cappuccino (OK, I don't really know what that means either, but I was looking for something humorous).  Some of these may well be fodder for future posts, but in the meantime, some quick takes:

  • 76% of wealthy people read blogs, one survey says (via Tim Wolters of Collective Intellect)
  • Interesting way to prove my point that content doesn't want to be free: "Starting today all existing members, and anyone who joins Cambrian House from this point forward, will earn a share in the business. The more engaged they are as members, the more shares they will earn over time. Cambrian House measures participation with a Glory Point system. Points are awarded for a variety of actions such as editing a member profile, commenting on a member’s business idea, completing a task, or submitting code. Shares are awarded based on participation and can be cashed out at any time." (901am)
  • comScore released a study and "determined that using cookies to determine web audience will on average overcount your audience by 2.5x.  That's right - 150% higher than it actually is." (Fred Wilson)
  • a great argument from new friend and fellow podcaster Adam Weiss about why you should start out with cheap gear when first podcasting ... and maybe stick with it like he has! For another perspective, Scott Bourne advocates a $1000 portable digital recorder
  • primer on how to communicate with angel investors as an entrepreneur
  • Kami Huyse offers 8 meaningful measurements of social media
  • Kudos to CustomScoop's Ian Muir who won a free trip to Microsoft's Mix07 conference by creating a winning design for REMIX07
  • aside: I didn't read most blogs while on vacation, but did check in with Twitter periodically.  Guess my opinion of the service is changing...
  • A great new marketing podcast is out with two talented podcasters at the mic: Marketing Over Coffee with Christopher Penn and John Wall.  Spent 15 minutes of my blog reading time with this in the background and picked up a bunch of useful nuggets.
  • Reading blogs could be good for your wallet.
  • There's now a magazine covering the social media space.  Blogger & Podcaster magazine has debuted. I'll probably check it out, but it seems a little strange to have an old media pub to cover new media.  Though they say they deliver in paper, electronic, and podcast format.  Could be interesting.
  • Paul Kedrosky has a good post on how we're getting lots more information around us but it isn't making the population more aware of facts.
  • Nikon is promoting its D80 Digital SLR camera through a blogger relations program.  BL Ochman has all the details.  (I have the Canon EOS 30D myself and love it, but Josh Hallett -- who is a much better and more prolific photographer than I -- is a huge D80 fan.)
  • So do I go to what will undoubtedly become the most overhyped conference of the year?  I'm a big fan of DEMO and this sounds like more fun, but... check out TechCrunch 20 for yourself and make your own call.  It ain't cheap, of course.

Sunday, April 08, 2007

Posting Will Resume on April 16

I'm headed mostly off the grid for the next week as I enjoy one of my periodic recharging periods -- in this case my annual winter visit away from the snow (yes, there's still a lot of it on the ground here in New Hampshire).

There will be no new episode of Disruptive Dialogue this week and blog posts are highly unlikely until I return.  In the meantime, feel free to check out the "most popular" posts in the right hand sidebar.

Friday, April 06, 2007

You Can't Really Know It If You Don't Do It

Some great advice from Charlie O'Donnell:

I think marketing & PR firms, VC firms, anyone who has any kind of business interest whatsover in social media needs to mandate that the decision makers on your staff, right on up to the top, all "walk the floor".   Maybe Fridays should be "social media days" where the whole office plays in MySpace, Second Life, blogs, plays World of Warcraft, Twitters, etc...   Like Google's 20% time.  Take some Flickr photos, poke some people in Facebook...   

I'm not sure an entire day every week is required -- I think that depends on precisely how social media fits into your company and job.  But I do believe it needs to be a significant investment by everyone involved.  More important, it shouldn't be mandatory.  If employees aren't interested in social media and inclined to use it of their own volition, they may not be the best fit for a social media-focused company or job position.

This is the same reason why most managers and coaches are ex-baseball players.  It's hard to coach a team if you haven't been there yourself.

(via Brian Oberkirch)

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Boston Area PR Scholarship Available

Mark McClennan of PRSA Boston asked me to mention a scholarship they're offering, and I'm more than happy to do so.  If you're an "undergraduate or graduate college student studying in the Boston area" and interested in PR, you should check out this $2,000 scholarship

An Entertaining and Brutal Trashing of Robert Bly's Blog Schmog

Rick Segal offers up a highly entertaining review of Robert Bly's Blog Schmog.  The book may not be worth a read (according to Rick), but his post certainly is!

(hat tip to Shel #1 for pointing this out)

How to Improve Comments on Podcasts

I happen to believe that podcasts are much more interesting when they have listener comments.  Though I don't share Michael O'Connor Clarke's general disdain for the quality of podcasts, I do share his distaste for "the kissyfest 'love the show' comments from loyal listeners."

The problem with most comments is that, like letters to the editor, they frequently show up when the topic at hand has gone stone cold.  Take for instance PRobecast #9 -- and I'm not picking on my friends at Topaz Partners here, it's just the podcast I'm listening to as I type.  I'd be inclined to leave a comment about the Fred Vogelstein story.  Except it happened over a week ago so by the time most folks listen to PRobecast #10 and hear my rant, it would be 2 weeks after anyone cared about the topic.  Since most business podcasts are weekly at best this 2 week lag will occur frequently. 

That's why I think Joseph Jaffe may be on to something. This morning and last night he was Twittering about topics that he wants to discuss on the next Across the Sound podcast and soliciting comments in advance of the show.  That's a great idea.  By gathering content from others for timely topics, the comments become more participation and less after the fact, letter to the editor drivel.

Now, Twitter may or may not be the right venue.  It's likely to generate a serious echo chamber effect where the same usual suspects comment all the time.  But many podcasts have that anyway and maybe it isn't so bad -- most talking head shows on TV or radio have similar commentators from week to week.

But I love the idea.  It makes comments more timely and valuable as contributions to the discussion.

Maybe I'll start posting topics to my blog in advance of my shows to try to get listener contributions like this...

Tuesday, April 03, 2007

You Can Go from Hell to Heaven with a Blogger

Good news for anyone who has crossed swords with a blogger.  It is possible to recover.  In a week in which we see Chris Locke and Kathy Sierra smiling and laughing together just days after serious accusations, including death threats, got tossed around, we now see Jeff Jarvis making nice with Dell.

I'm not sure which one is harder to believe, but I do know it is the latter that really interests me. 

For those unfamiliar, here's the short version from Jeff:

I had a rather infamous run-in with Dell here at Buzzmachine when I complained about a bad machine and service. They ignored me, but thousands of similarly frustrated customers did not.

This became known as "Dell Hell" and generated massively bad publicity for the company.  In recent months, however, Michael Dell has reasserted control over the company.  Dell has now gone to great lengths to join the online conversation, including starting a blog as well as an online suggestion site that has drawn incredible community interest.

Indeed, Dell is now going to offer Linux based computers because of the results of this online outreach.  For a company that resisted this sort of offering in the past, this is a major about-face.

Just as big was the outreach the company did to Jarvis recently:

When I blogged that I was headed down to Austin and the University of Texas last week, I got email out of the blue from Dell’s chief blogger, Lionel Menchaca, inviting me to meet him and his colleagues over drinks or out at Dell HQ. I said I hadn’t been planning to pack my flak jacket and he replied, “Even though it is Texas, there will be no guns involved.”

The meeting went so well that Jeff now says he wants to go back and talk with the company some more to learn about their transformation.  And rather than lambasting the company as a bunch of people who don't understand their customers, he now writes:

And so it was a delight to sit down with three guys from Dell and look at the new world from the same side. These guys get it.

This story clearly demonstrates that if a company gets in hot water in the blogosphere, all hope is not lost.  By changing practices and -- more importantly -- communicating more effectively with the social media community, reputations can be recovered.  It's not a slow process, and for Dell it clearly isn't over (for many in the blogosphere, they will likely remain, at a minimum, on probation for quite some time). 

In the past I have lamented the fact that the Blog Mob style of justice often used throughout the blogosphere scares companies away from joining the online conversation.  As bloggers and podcasters, we want those companies here with us, not on the outside looking in.  Hopefully the Jeff Jarvis and Dell story will now become a case study in how to recover, and not merely how to do things wrong.

First Takes on the Topix Course Correction

When I first reported on the changes taking place at Topix Sunday, I didn't grasp just how significant the changes would be.  Now that I've had a chance to actually explore the new web site and digest Rich Skrenta's explanation, I can see that this is really huge.

At first, I had thought they were changing their emphasis and some of the methodology.  But now I see that it is a radical overhaul.  When you first login to the new site, it looks entirely different.  It really has become a completely local site.  You can still get national news and such, but it is a lot harder to find those links than it was before.  Clearly, this is a full-blown effort at achieving localized communities for news.

No longer can it be said that Topix provides a Google News-esque offering.  For instance, there's no longer a news search option as far as I can tell, just the ability to look up pre-defined topics. 

I'm not sure I completely understand some of what they're doing, however.  For instance, they have forums that don't seem to be related to news or geography at all -- like the Bon Jovi forum.  So while Rich emphasizes geography in his post and the Topix home page now asks for a zip code above all else, they seem to be interested in creating community beyond geography.

The notion of creating localized communities certainly seems to have merit, but I imagine it will take time to prove this concept out.  It also seems to me that more beyond news is needed to create a truly sticky local community online.  Events, for instance, would seem to be to be a valuable pairing, just as it is with local newspapers. 

I'm sure Rich and the rest of the team at Topix has already thought this through, but if they were able to come up with a community portal that combined news, weather, events, entertainment, movie listings, TV listings, etc. based on zip code, it might be a really powerful place.  But starting with news probably makes the most sense because it is the least geographically organized to date and you need to have a unique selling proposition to build that initial community from which all other things may spring.

It also strikes me that the biggest challenge will be in creating that sense of community outside of technology centers.  So many of these online services are strong where early adopters and high-tech communities thrive, but find it difficult to penetrate grassroots America.  It seems to me that to be the powerful local ad engine that I think the newspapers envisioned it as when they invested in the company a few years ago, it will need to go beyond the high-tech hives.

Topix will definitely be a company to keep an eye on to see how this radical shift shakes out.

UPDATE: Rich comments that search still exists, it is just hard to find.  He also points to a heat map that seems to show pretty broad activity, not just in high-tech hotbeds.  I based my judgment based on "random" zip code lookups, but obviously the map has more credibility than my testing.

Technorati tags: , ,

Disruptive Dialogue Podcast #5 - 04/03/2007

download Disruptive Dialogue podcastThe fifth episode of the Disruptive Dialogue podcast is now available.  This one was recorded in Bow, NH and is 21:17.  You can download this podcast as an MP3 or subscribe to the RSS feed to make sure you never miss an episode.

Topics:

  • 00:34 - Opening & Introduction
  • 02:05 - NCAA Bracket and Wisdom of the Crowds
  • 03:57 - Does content want to be free?
  • 08:39 - Promo for Podcamp NYC
  • 09:05 - A new kind of book promotion
  • 13:16 - Listener Comments
  • 13:36 - Doug Haslam comments on live blogging
  • 16:38 - 2 Minutes of Other Podcasts
  • 19:46 - Wrap-up

Show Notes:

To Comment:

  • Leave your comments here
  • Call the Disruptive Dialogue comment line: (206) 424-4733
  • Email me your comments in MP3 format (no more than 2 minutes and 5 MB, please)

Wisdom of the Crowds Worked with NCAA Bracket Picking

It turns out that relying on the masses to help you pick your NCAA bracket can work.  As I explained before, I made my picks for March Madness this year based on what the majority of CBS Sportsline users had done.  Since I generally stink at this stuff, I figured I had nothing to lose.

With Florida now crowned champion, I can tell you that I finished second out of 106 entries in the pool I participated in.  That's my highest finish ever.  I don't fully understand the formula, but I think the main reason I didn't win was because the guy ahead of me correctly picked the VCU upset over Duke and you got more points for picking upsets.  But we both picked the outcome of 50 games correctly (though not the same 50).

Going in, my belief had been that wisdom of the crowds might work with experts, but not as much with the general population.  I guess I may have to reconsider that given my success here.  Of course, one entry doesn't really make for a scientific experiment, but that's OK. 

Drinks are on me!

7 Deadly Sins Featured in Bulldog Reporter's Daily Dog

Bulldog Reporter ran a column from me today that details my 7 Deadly Sins of Pitching Bloggers that I have written about in this space before. 

  • Download the complete white paper for free
  • Listen to a special 15 minute podcast version of the 7 Deadly Sins

Sunday, April 01, 2007

Topix.net Rebrands & Turns to Human Editors

Topix: Local News for the WorldPaidContent's Rafat Ali has the scoop on the future of Topix, the local news aggregator and search site owned by several competing newspaper companies.  Apparently, as they rebrand from Topix.net to Topix.com, they will also be changing the focus of their site from software-selected content to human editors and citizen journalism.

The homepage will become a hub of citizen-generated news (more Netscape.com-like in implementation than Digg), with easy-to-use tools for users to blog/vote stories onto the main and section pages.

Much like before, the site’s focus is on zip-cod based local news. Anyone can now submit local news for any U.S. zip code through the site or through mobiles. Participants can also become editors of the local pages.

I find the new focus fascinating because I have believed for some time that as good as computers are, they can't replace editorial judgment entirely.  Moreover, I believe that human review can remove some of the antiseptic feel of completely computer generated sites.

It will be interesting to see the results of the change, though I do wonder about whether the fact that they are making two major changes simultaneously will make it harder to determine the success of either.  Rick Skentra is one of the smarter thinkers in the information aggregation space, though, so I wouldn't bet against their ability to pull this one off.

UPDATE: Rick has now posted a detailed explanation.  Worth a read.

April Foolishness

Call me a fuddy-duddy.  Call me a curmudgeon.  But I find the flurry of April Fool's blog posts to be annoying.  The best ones make it hard to tell fact from fiction (see TechCrunch & FC), but unfortunately that makes one doubt even real news today. Plenty of people have been caught in the fake news net this weekend, since some apparently decided to make it a two day event.

And whatever happened to the convention of ending these jokes with "April Fools!"? If these blog posts at least ended that way, it would be much better.

Technorati tags:

eJamming as a Tool for Podcasters?

I got a note this week that one of the companies I wrote about from the DEMO conference has launched has opened up for a free public beta.  Now, this isn't the sort of product that would interest me since my interest in music is slim and I haven't played an instrument since guitar in my high school music class (and that was scary, let me tell you).  And obviously readers don't come here to hear me talk about music and bands and such. 

But as I thought about this company, eJamming, it dawned on me that there was something that it might be used for beyond its intended purpose.  The site is designed to facilitate remote jamming sessions for musicians where up to 4 performers are in different geographic locations.  They claim to be able to create high-quality streams that are perfectly synchronized over broadband connections. 

It certainly seemed like a neat idea, but not that appealing to me -- until it occurred to me that it might be used to enable co-located podcasting without the hiccups often associated with Skype and potentially with sound quality on par with podcasters in the same room on high-quality mics. 

So I asked the company if that was a potential use, and they agreed that it was.  Now, I haven't tried it myself, but any podcasters in the audience who do co-located podcasting now using Skype or something else may be interested in trying out this approach.

If you do, let me know how it works out.