Online Media

Thursday, December 27, 2007

Top Online News Sites

I came across some interesting data while doing some research tonight, and I thought I'd share it in raw form before I have a chance to tie it together with some thoughts I have.

What follows are the 10 most trafficked online news sites that create original content, according to data from Alexa.  We can dispute the accuracy of Alexa data, but it is publicly available and in many instances I believe that the relative positions it offers are correct in many cases.  Of course, I welcome other data from comScore or others if they'd like to share it.

In parentheses after each is the overall site rank in the Alexa system.

1. BBC (50)
2. CNN (113)
3. NY Times (227)
4. MSNBC (*)
5. Reuters (561)
6. Forbes.com (656)
7. Guardian Unlimited (689)
8. Fox News (759)
9. News.com.au (798)
10. Washington Post (865)

* MSNBC's overall traffic ranking is not provided but rather is included in MSN.com's numbers

Here are the 10 U.S. newspaper web sites with the most traffic, again according to Alexa with overall site rank in parentheses.

1. NY Times (227)
2. Washington Post (865)
3. USA Today (1036)
4. Wall Street Journal (1036)
5. LA Times (1507)
6. San Francisco Chronicle (1708)
7. NY Post (2436)
8. Chicago Tribune (2918)
9. Houston Chronicle (4072)
10. Seattle Post-Intelligencer (**)

** Seattle Post-Intelligencer's overall traffic ranking is not provided but rather is included in nwsource.com's numbers

Saturday, December 22, 2007

Doug Haslam, Online TV Star

Doug Haslam of Topaz Partners was kind enough to grant an interview to Sarah Wurrey of CustomScoop's Media Bullseye during the recent SNCR symposium in Boston.  Doug talked about his firm's work with Scuderi Group to promote an innovative new air hybrid engine.

Not only does it make good content, but it's also letting me perfect my video production skills.  Each one I produce seems to improve, even though I still have a long way to go.

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

StartRocket Delayed; Cork & Knife Launches

Slight change of plans in the order of launches in the properties in the new media company I'm starting.  StartRocket, the site focused on web entrepreneurship East of the Rockies, had been slated to begin producing content this week.  However, I have opted to delay for a few weeks to address some logistical/infrastructure issues, as well as to try to line up additional contributors before going public.

While those things are getting sorted out, I decided to release the new media site that I had slotted to launch second, Cork & Knife.  This site is focused on the people that make a difference in your professional or amateur fine dining experience.  Chefs, sommeliers, bartenders, servers, authors, purveyors, winemakers, and even the food media will be profiled to help foodies and gourmets learn more about the philosophies and personalities that impact the food and wine.

So, check out Cork & Knife and let me know if you are interested in becoming a contributor to that site or especially to StartRocket

I'll keep you updated in this space on developments on both fronts.

Thursday, July 05, 2007

Michael Moore Parody Shows Power of Video

Regular readers know that I strongly believe that one should use the right medium for the message you are communicating.  That is after all one of the huge underlying themes of The New Media Cocktail.

My friend Doug Simon demonstrates this aptly on his video blog with a very entertaining parody of Michael Moore.  Now, Doug and I don't agree on politics, but the video clearly communicates his message: that he's a big fan of Michael Moore, but feels that Moore's actions helped elect George Bush in 2000.

It's worth watching regardless of your politics.  At a minimum you should be entertained, and hopefully you will agree that the medium was perfect for this message.

Thursday, June 28, 2007

The New Media Cocktail

image Recently I started to write a blog post about the future of media.  I planned to address the two big themes that I see playing a significant role in how we will produce and consume media in coming years.  It spiraled a bit out of control and became a 30 page e-book titled The New Media Cocktail.  It is available to download for free as a PDF.

The two themes I have identified and discuss in The New Media Cocktail are:

  • Convergence
  • The power of niches

Regular readers of this blog and listeners to my Disruptive Dialogue podcast know that I have been nearly obsessed with the future of media of late.  I have spent a lot of time reading, researching, and thinking about the issue.  Hopefully The New Media Cocktail contributes to the great thinking already taking place in this space.  I want to thank some of the most provocative bloggers in this space for forcing me to focus on and examine the trends.  In particular the words and deeds of Jeff Jarvis, Mark Cuban, Chris Anderson, Dave Winer, Chris Garrett, and Jason Calacanis had a significant impact on my outlook. 

I also want to thank three people who provided invaluable feedback to me on early drafts of The New Media CocktailShel Israel, Sarah Wurrey, and Jen White all contributed significantly to the final product.  (Though all mistakes are, of course, my own.)

It's a quick -- and I hope provocative -- read.  I encourage you to download the PDF and let me know what you think.  I plan to do a follow-up post soon with some of the feedback I receive here in the comments or in blog posts elsewhere.

Monday, June 04, 2007

10 Ways the Rules of the Media Business are Being Rewritten

Traditional ("old") media finds itself experiencing an earthquake of change as online ("new") media changes the rules of the game.  Some publishers and broadcasters find themselves struggling to adapt, while others thrive on the ability to innovate.  The competition becomes more intense by the day and the fears among old school journalists and media executives rise in direct proportion.

Let me be clear: I am not one who believes that new media will kill old media.  Newspapers, broadcast television, and terrestrial radio are here to stay.  Those who innovate and adapt will thrive; those who fail will perish.  The solid gold oldies and the young turks must all play on the same playing field today, and understanding how the rules are being rewritten will be key to future success for both camps. 

1.  Publishers are Broadcasters and Broadcasters are Publishers.

Media convergence has arrived.  Newspapers are producing audio and video.  TV and radio are producing print copy.  Media outlets no longer find themselves constrained to one specific medium.  Technology permits all media outlets to compete on each other's turf.

2.  Column Inches and Broadcast Minutes are No Longer Limited.

It used to be that print reporters would see stories dropped because there weren't enough available column inches to print the article.  TV and radio journalists would get squeezed out because an hour only has 60 minutes no matter how you slice it.  Today, the web enables all media to publish and produce unlimited content.  This is a blessing and curse because it means a lot more high quality material makes it into the public arena, but it is harder to kill low-quality stuff without telling the journalist that directly.

3.  The Audience Can be a Partner in Content Creation.

When breaking news hits, the audience now contributes.  Media outlets openly solicit still and video footage from cell phones or other portable devices for disasters and tragedies.  Remember the student whose cell phone video footage made it on CNN in a seemingly endless loop after the Virginia Tech shooting?  Local stations do the same thing for pictures of floods and other natural disasters. Even the print media has gotten into this game.

4.  The Media Now Competes with Its Own Audience.

The rise of blogs, podcasts, and online video now mean that media outlets are competing with their own audiences.  Anybody can create a podcast that competes with NPR, a blog that competes with the Washington Post, or a video site that competes with CNN.  Everyone can be a broadcaster and publisher, at low cost and with minimal effort.

5.  Old Advertising/Revenue Models Will Be Replaced.

You can't put a 30 second pre-roll ad on every 2 minute news story.  Nobody sticks around to watch post-roll.  Podcasts aren't radio, so the same ad structure doesn't work.  Full-page display advertising?  Not on a newspaper web site!  And classified advertising hasn't simply migrated to the web, the whole nature of it has changed.  Where's the line between classifieds and eBay auctions?  Between Craigslist and a yard sale?  Similarly, despite ESPN's efforts, ISP's aren't typically going to pay to carry content.  And subscription revenue models will need to be revamped to recognize the shifting landscape.

6.  Archives are Valuable.

In the old days, the only people who cared about newspaper morgues and tape libraries were researchers, librarians, and other hard-core information professionals.  Today search engines can help open these archives up to a public, hungry for information.  Looking at old articles no longer require microfiche or a subscription to a legacy research service.  Digging up old video doesn't need to involve a call to a service that fetches a dusty videotape and copies it.  Archives can be a source for ongoing traffic -- and thus revenue -- to media outlets.

7.  Niches Have Increasing Value.

The old media paradigm precluded effective niche publications.  A truly focused niche would likely have too few potential subscribers to justify a magazine.  Certainly a radio or TV show would be unlikely to be devoted to these niches.  But highly-targeted niches have real value for audiences, content creators, and marketers and can be exploited effectively in the new media world.  Consumers increasingly want to see just the slice of information they're interested in, and generic national, international, business, and entertainment news increasingly becomes a boring commodity.

8.  Unedited Content is Becoming More Common.

Stories are going online in print, audio, or video with less and less editing.  As news cycles disappear and are replaced by the world of instant information, credible journalists are posting to blogs and producing audio and video so quickly that editing would be impractical.  Content producers must therefore trust their content creators to make sound editorial judgment by themselves on the fly. 

9.  News Cycles are Dead.  Information is Instantaneous.

In the Edward R. Murrow/Walter Cronkite/David Brinkley era, news cycles lasted 24 hours until the next nightly newscast came on the air.  Twenty-four hour cable news networks began to shrink the news cycle and Web 1.0 brought it down to mere hours.  Today, the news cycle is dead.  Information transmits instantaneously and responses often come before the news is completely made.  In politics, a presidential debate doesn't even conclude anymore before detailed responses, rebuttals, attacks, and supplemental information has been made public.  The "official" pundits have yet to offer their views on TV before the new media space has rendered judgment of their own.

10.  Choices, Choices, and More Choices.

For those who thought that cable television ushered in an age of too many choices for consumers, welcome to the Media 2.0 world.  There are now more information choices than there are products in a Wal-Mart Supercenter.  (A Supercenter has about 116,000 different products on sale.)  Even someone interested in a niche as focused as bacon can find 1,050 blogs tagged for that subject, according to Technorati's directory.  (I'm sure that list has a lot of fat in it, but there's lots of meat as well -- OK, I couldn't help myself.)

*****

Readers of this blog and listeners to my podcast know that the future of media continues to fascinate me.  The opportunities to innovate and excel in this arena could not be richer.  The possibilities are plentiful and the value in success is high for those who innovate and execute well.  Ultimately, consumers and innovators will both win.

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Online Ad Revenue for Newspapers Slipping

From PaidContent:

as the earnings for the NYTCO, Gannett and Tribune have shown, interactive ad dollars are not growing as expected (Dow Jones and the smaller Journal Register Company represent the exceptions). And as WaPO prepares to release its Q1 earnings, the CEO of its online division tells the WSJ that online ad growth is slowing across the board.

Friday, April 06, 2007

You Can't Really Know It If You Don't Do It

Some great advice from Charlie O'Donnell:

I think marketing & PR firms, VC firms, anyone who has any kind of business interest whatsover in social media needs to mandate that the decision makers on your staff, right on up to the top, all "walk the floor".   Maybe Fridays should be "social media days" where the whole office plays in MySpace, Second Life, blogs, plays World of Warcraft, Twitters, etc...   Like Google's 20% time.  Take some Flickr photos, poke some people in Facebook...   

I'm not sure an entire day every week is required -- I think that depends on precisely how social media fits into your company and job.  But I do believe it needs to be a significant investment by everyone involved.  More important, it shouldn't be mandatory.  If employees aren't interested in social media and inclined to use it of their own volition, they may not be the best fit for a social media-focused company or job position.

This is the same reason why most managers and coaches are ex-baseball players.  It's hard to coach a team if you haven't been there yourself.

(via Brian Oberkirch)

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Business 2.0 Stuck in a Publishing 1.0 World

Business 2.0As I have mentioned, I still read dead tree versions of magazines.  But when I find an article I like in the print edition, I usually turn to the online version to forward links to colleagues or include in posts on this blog.  It's simply more convenient and reader-friendly.

Unfortunately, Business 2.0 remains stuck in a Publishing 1.0 world.  OK, perhaps it is more like version 1.1, but still it falls far short of what one would expect in today's media environment.  It turns out that they don't publish all of their content online.  Now, if they had it all there and charged for access to some, I could understand that.  After all, I'm not one of those "all content must be free" types.  I support subscription models.

But Business 2.0 publishes stuff in the magazine that doesn't make it onto the web in any form.  That's very unusual for a high-profile publication these days, especially one that bills itself as "the playbook for a new generation of leaders."

So when I went to find a link for "A Startup's Best Friend? Failure" from the March 2007 issue to talk about it on this blog, I couldn't do it.  It simply wasn't there.  I looked high and low. Used the search feature.  Got nothing.

I may yet write about the power of failure.  But it will be harder to tell the story without allowing my readers to click on a simple link to read about the experiences described in the article.  They can't read the original source to hear about the errors made by Dogster or Riya and how those companies learned from them and grew because of it. 

Regrettably, my readers lose out on the full quality of the experience as it should have been, and Business 2.0 loses out on some readers.

UPDATE: Business 2.0 posted the failure article this morning (2/28) on its web site.  Better late than never, I suppose.

Monday, February 26, 2007

KFC/Taco Bell Rat Crisis Shows Online Media Monitoring is YUMmy

Mark Harvey of Hass MS&L does an excellent job of explaining how the KFC/Taco Bell Rat Crisis in New York's Greenwich Village proves the need for effective online media monitoring.  He demonstrates that Yum! Brands, the parent of the two restaurants, could have used monitoring to more effectively respond.

For those unfamiliar with the story, the 2 minute video below tells the story clearly.

Mark incorporates a timeline to show how the story unfolded and grew in an effort to address his central thesis: "When you sell blog and or board/media monitoring, people may ask, 'How bad can it be, I mean how fast can my reputation go south?'"

He wraps up in a way that I couldn't have probably said better myself:

If this company had media monitoring and crisis monitoring someone could have called to move media crews away from the front window or covered the front window where dozens of media outlets had set up shop filming and getting customer reaction shots. They weren't pleasant. Words like "sickened" and "disturbing" and "gross" all played out on national media with the KFC/Taco Bell logo right behind.

Seven hours is all it took...

I recommend reading the post to understand not only the importance of media monitoring, but also crisis communications.  As readers of this blog know, the marriage of the two has been a topic of interest to me lately.

Advertisements

What Is Pardon the Disruption?

  • As founder & CEO of CustomScoop, I have a special interest in the intersection of technology and PR/marketing. In addition, as a serial entrepreneur and angel investor, I cover those topics, as well as an occasional post on the gadgets I love.